Again, We difficulty one developed a non-bigotted factor in refusing so you’re able to pic a homosexual matrimony
The state topic may matter the guidelines, nevertheless topic will get the temperatures of modern-day intimate morality
I believe Henry is actually completely wrong in shaping Friedersdorf claim to be you to definitely really-religiously-against-gay-matrimony people are not bigots, in the sense from disliking the brand new items of its discrimination. He’s just stating that they aren’t always bigots.
I guess of numerous pro-segregationists in the Southern area failed to positively hate blacks. I mean – they allow them to care for kids as well as. But positively within the finding blacks to keep next group citizens it remained bigots?
He could be saying that new distinction Friedersdorf can make anywhere between bigots and folks with absolutely nothing against gays, but simply don’t believe they should have equivalent liberties try low-sensical
I believe concerns such as this are legally interesting, newest, and you may related hypotheticals.